A multi-millionaire football chairman told police he had been ‘headbutted’ by a disgruntled employee following a foul-mouthed argument between the pair, an employment tribunal heard.
Robbie Cowling, chairman and owner of League Two club Colchester United, claimed he had been attacked by Mark Harris, who worked for the club’s ‘Football in the Community’ charitable arm.
The tribunal heard that Mr Cowling – who is also the chairman of the charity’s trustees – and former PE teacher Mr Harris were swearing at each other in a corridor following a meeting between the pair in 2019.
The panel said 60-year-old Mr Cowling called Mr Harris a ‘f***ing c***’ as the employee was walking away. CCTV footage then showed Mr Harris react by turning back and ‘barging into him, stomach first’.
Mr Cowling, who has an estimated fortune of £40 million, bought a controlling stake in the club in 2006 after making his fortune founding online recruitment company JobServe.
Robbie Cowling, 60, (pictured) chairman and owner of League Two club Colchester United, claimed he had been attacked by Mark Harris, who worked for the club’s ‘Football in the Community’ charitable arm
Mr Harris won a claim for victimisation, by being dismissed, against Colchester United FC Football in the Community at the tribunal held in East London.
The pair clashed after Mr Harris was dismissed in April 2019 from the charity and he lodged a grievance the following month.
The grievance was dismissed on July 13 and an appeal then took place, which was attended by Mr Cowling and recorded on a memory stick.
During the four-hour appeal meeting Mr Harris asked for his boss, Corin Haines, the charity’s CEO, to be subject to disciplinary action and given professional guidance.
He also asked for an apology from Mr Haines and compensation to be agreed for two former colleagues who had left the charity – stating he would not discuss his own compensation until theirs was agreed.
Employment judge Paul Housego said: ‘Mr Cowling was seething over Mr Harris’ demands, particularly the fact he had preconditions relating to others before he would even talk about himself.
Mr Harris (pictured) won a claim for victimisation, by being dismissed, against Colchester United FC Football in the Community at the tribunal held in East London
‘When he went outside to hand over the memory stick he asked Mr Harris if he had a minute.
‘He told Mr Harris he had sought legal advice and that Mr Harris’ claim was frivolous and that they would go after him for costs.
‘Mr Cowling added that he would defend an Employment Tribunal claim, whatever it cost him.
‘Mr Harris told Mr Cowling that the test was vexatious rather than frivolous, and then became angry, insulting him with foul language. Mr Cowling responded in kind.
‘The dialogue then seems to indicate that Mr Cowling was egging Mr Harris on to hit him, and the CCTV the Tribunal has seen seems to back this up, because Mr Cowling is seen standing with his hands behind his back while they are speaking almost nose to nose.
The pair clashed after Mr Harris was dismissed in April 2019 from the charity and he lodged a grievance the following month. After a four-hour appeal meeting Mr Cowling ‘told Mr Harris he had sought legal advice and that Mr Harris’ claim was frivolous and that they would go after him for costs.’ Pictured: JobServe Community Stadium
‘Mr Harris then turned on his heel and walked away. When he was about 10 metres away Mr Cowling said something, undoubtedly deeply offensive to Mr Harris, who spun round, walked straight back to Mr Cowling and barged into him, stomach first.’
The tribunal decided Mr Cowling most likely called Mr Harris a ‘f***ing c***’, as they believed Mr Harris’ account of events.
Both men complained to the police. Mr Cowling said that Mr Harris had head-butted him but the CCTV did not indicate any such contact.
Mr Harris told the tribunal all went well in his first 10 months with the charity, until December 2018 when he supported a female colleague who resigned at her subsequent grievance meeting.
The tribunal found the attitude of Mr Harris’ boss Corin Haines, the charity’s CEO, ‘changed towards him’ after that.
Mr Haines then dismissed him on April 5, 2019, as his role was ‘not viable’ because the traineeship programme he was organising, which was said to be necessary to provide the income needed to pay him, was no longer going to take place.
When it did not attract any applicants, the tribunal heard that Mr Haines used this as an excuse to sack Mr Harris.
However, employment judge Paul Housego found the real reason was Mr Harris helping the female colleague at her grievance meeting.
He said: ‘This was not the reason Mr Harris was dismissed. That was because, now that the project had not received any recruits, Mr Haines was able to use that as the reason for dismissing him, he having decided to do so… because his attitude towards Mr Harris had changed.
‘There is… a causative link between Mr Harris helping (the colleague) at a grievance meeting, which was partly about discrimination (both disability and gender), causing Mr Haines attitude towards Mr Harris to worsen, leading him to ring fence Mr Harris in the traineeship programme, and to use its failure to dismiss Mr Harris as “not viable”.’
On March 22, 2019, Mr Haines sent documents to Mr Harris showing the traineeship programme would cost at £19,975.
The tribunal heard Mr Harris was not shown as a cost in the programme, but Mr Haines said if it had 10 trainees it would break even and make a profit of £5,000 with 12.
The judge added: ‘Neither Mr Harris nor Mr Cowling come out of this episode with any credit. Mr Harris appeared the more ashamed of the two about the incident.’
The tribunal ruled that Mr Harris had been victimised, by being dismissed and a further hearing will now take place to decide on how much compensation he should be paid.